Skip to content
Blaenau Gwent Counts — Blaenau Gwent, in numbers.Local help →

Blaenau Gwent, in numbers

Action plan

Blaenau Gwent council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Practical proposed steps for Blaenau Gwent.

The stages explain what should happen first. They are not promised completion dates. Funding, powers and ongoing costs need to be established before a proposal is adopted.

  1. New play spaces are already open
  2. Buying the shopping centre leaves choices unresolved
  3. Use the new school’s wider facilities
  4. Improved assets need operating budgets
  5. Make room for homes people can afford
  6. Plan homes and care around an older population
  7. Bring support closer to people in poor health
  8. Connect local skills to local opportunities
  9. Target safety work where problems repeat
  10. Turn published plans into visible progress
  11. Target support where disadvantages overlap

Proposal

New play spaces are already open

Four named play areas have been refurbished.

Proposed response: Keep them safe, accessible and maintained.

Evidence

Who could lead: Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council with the named delivery partners.

  1. Short term

    Publish access and fault-reporting details.

  2. Medium term

    Inspect equipment with users and community groups.

  3. Long term

    Plan replacement funding before equipment wears out.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Four refurbished play areas: Refurbished and open by July 2026

Measure: Available equipment and repair response times.

Trade-off: Community support does not remove council maintenance duties.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Four refurbished play areas →

Proposal

Buying the shopping centre leaves choices unresolved

Longer-term options are still being developed for Gwent Shopping Centre.

Proposed response: Make existing traders’ needs part of the next decision.

Evidence

Who could lead: Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council with the named delivery partners.

  1. Short term

    Publish occupancy and repair priorities.

  2. Medium term

    Compare viable uses with traders and residents.

  3. Long term

    Track occupied units through delivery.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Gwent Shopping Centre acquisition: Purchased; improvement work and future options reported

Measure: Units in use and traders retained.

Trade-off: Keeping rents affordable can limit income for repairs.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Gwent Shopping Centre acquisition →

Proposal

Use the new school’s wider facilities

Glyncoed provides new learning and nursery space.

Proposed response: Check how families benefit from the new provision.

Evidence

Who could lead: Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council with the named delivery partners.

  1. Short term

    Publish access and nursery arrangements.

  2. Medium term

    Monitor demand and inclusion needs.

  3. Long term

    Review whether provision meets local families’ needs.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Glyncoed Primary School: New school in use by February 2026 visit

Measure: Places used and access barriers resolved.

Trade-off: New buildings require ongoing staffing and maintenance.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Glyncoed Primary School →

Proposal

Improved assets need operating budgets

Schools and play areas need upkeep after construction ends.

Proposed response: Tie the capital investment to realistic maintenance plans.

Evidence 1 · Evidence 2

Who could lead: Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council with the named delivery partners.

  1. Short term

    List upkeep responsibilities.

  2. Medium term

    Schedule inspections and maintenance.

  3. Long term

    Report downtime and replacement needs.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Glyncoed Primary School: New school in use by February 2026 visit; Four refurbished play areas: Refurbished and open by July 2026

Measure: Assets remaining available and in good condition.

Trade-off: Maintenance competes with other services for recurring funds.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Glyncoed Primary School →

Four refurbished play areas →

Proposal

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £681 a month (August 2026) in Blaenau Gwent council area. This is £165 lower than the Wales average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 8.5% in Rassau and Garnlydan to 27.8% in Abertillery and Six Bells — a gap of 19.2 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

Who could lead: The housing and planning authorities, housing associations and developers.

  1. Start now

    Publish the local waiting list, temporary accommodation and affordable-home delivery figures together. Start by checking the different needs in Abertillery and Six Bells and Rassau and Garnlydan; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test proposed housing sites against affordable-home need, access to work, school places and water capacity.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check whether completed homes reduce unmet need, rather than counting planning permissions as delivery.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Average private rent is £681 a month (August 2026) in Blaenau Gwent council area. Homes rented privately ranged from 8.5% in Rassau and Garnlydan to 27.8% in Abertillery and Six Bells — a gap of 19.2 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 14 of 14 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Affordable homes completed, households waiting, time in temporary accommodation, and rent compared with local earnings.

Trade-off: More homes can put pressure on infrastructure and land. Affordability requirements also affect development viability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: Average monthly rent →

Evidence: Average home price →

Proposal

Plan homes and care around an older population

20.2% of people in Blaenau Gwent council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 16.7% in Ebbw Vale South to 23% in Beaufort — a gap of 6.3 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

Who could lead: Adult social care, local health services, housing providers and transport authorities.

  1. Start now

    Compare the location of older residents with access to care, shops and transport. Start by checking the different needs in Beaufort and Ebbw Vale South; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Prioritise home adaptations and care capacity in places with the clearest unmet need.

  3. Over the longer term

    Build accessible homes and joined-up care into local development plans.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 20.2% aged 65 or over; 21 March 2021. People aged 65 or over ranged from 16.7% in Ebbw Vale South to 23% in Beaufort — a gap of 6.3 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 14 of 14 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Waits for home adaptations and care, avoidable hospital stays, and accessible homes delivered.

Trade-off: Services need skilled staff and ongoing funding. Age profiles alone cannot measure unmet care need.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 65 or over →

Proposal

Bring support closer to people in poor health

9.5% of people reported bad or very bad health in Blaenau Gwent council area (21 March 2021). Across Wales, the figure was 6.9%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 7.6% in Georgetown to 12.4% in Tredegar — a gap of 4.8 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

Who could lead: Local health services, public health teams, employers and community organisations.

  1. Start now

    Use neighbourhood evidence to find where poor health and barriers to services overlap. Start by checking the different needs in Tredegar and Georgetown; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test accessible local support and publish who is reached and who is missed.

  3. Over the longer term

    Review whether health gaps narrow, alongside housing and employment improvements.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 9.5% reporting bad or very bad health; 21 March 2021. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 7.6% in Georgetown to 12.4% in Tredegar — a gap of 4.8 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 14 of 14 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Access to services and the health gap between neighbourhoods, using comparable age-adjusted measures when available.

Trade-off: A census snapshot is dated. New service decisions also need current needs assessments and residents’ experience.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People reporting bad or very bad health →

Proposal

Connect local skills to local opportunities

21.6% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in Blaenau Gwent council area. Across Wales, the figure was 31.5%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 21.2% in Georgetown to 33% in Tredegar — a gap of 11.8 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

Who could lead: Employers, colleges, universities and the relevant skills authority.

  1. Start now

    Compare vacancies and employer needs with training available to local residents. Start by checking the different needs in Tredegar and Georgetown; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Link training to real jobs, including routes for people without formal qualifications.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained employment and earnings after training, not just course starts.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 21.6% with a degree or equivalent; 21 March 2021. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 21.2% in Georgetown to 33% in Tredegar — a gap of 11.8 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 14 of 14 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Sustained jobs, earnings and training completion for residents who face barriers to work.

Trade-off: Training takes time and cannot create demand for jobs on its own. Qualifications are not a complete measure of ability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent →

Evidence: People aged 16+ with no qualifications →

Gwent Shopping Centre acquisition →

Proposal

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in Blaenau Gwent council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

Who could lead: The local police force, council community safety team and relevant services.

  1. Start now

    Check recurring places and categories alongside local police priorities and residents’ reports.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test focused prevention and support, with a comparison period agreed before the work starts.

  3. Over the longer term

    Publish whether problems fall, move elsewhere or return, and adjust the response.

How to judge progress

Crime evidence and coverage →

Starting point: Use the dated, complete periods shown in Crime and safety; keep anti-social behaviour separate.

Measure: Comparable recorded incidents, repeat victimisation and residents’ reported experience; never a single crude league table.

Trade-off: More reporting can increase recorded crime. Enforcement and support may work differently for different problems.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Proposal

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

Who could lead: The named project owners and council scrutiny bodies.

  1. Start now

    Put the scope, owner, funding position and next milestone in one public place.

  2. Over the next few years

    Report delivery against the agreed scope and explain delays or changes.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check the benefits residents actually receive after completion.

How to judge progress

Starting point: The dated stages in Projects; unknown costs and funding remain unknown.

Measure: Milestones met, costs against the approved budget, and measured outcomes after delivery.

Trade-off: Delivery reporting takes staff time, but a launch announcement alone cannot show value for money.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Glyncoed Primary School →

Gwent Shopping Centre acquisition →

Four refurbished play areas →

Proposal

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 21% in Georgetown to 34.8% in Tredegar — a gap of 13.7 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

Who could lead: The council's housing, public health and employment teams, with local services.

  1. Start now

    Check current advice and support access in Tredegar, using the census pattern as a starting point and asking residents what is missing.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test joined-up housing, work and health support, and publish who takes part, who cannot reach it and what changes.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained outcomes and whether gaps between neighbourhoods narrow, using comparable dates and measures.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 21% in Georgetown to 34.8% in Tredegar — a gap of 13.7 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 14 of 14 wards.

Measure: Access to support, unresolved housing problems and sustained work or health outcomes. Census percentages alone cannot measure a new programme's success.

Trade-off: Targeting neighbourhoods can miss people in need elsewhere. Avoid labelling every resident by the average for their ward.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: Households facing two or more measured disadvantages →

Glyncoed Primary School →

Four refurbished play areas →

From evidence to delivery